For Companies Dedicated To Success In The Marketplace, Desktop Management Is Critical

There are few types of businesses which do not use information system technology. Even for businesses like landscaping where most work is hands on, physical and outside, the business end of your company will likely use computers. They are simply to efficient at everything from scheduling, mapping, billing and communicating to overlook them as a tool for the company. When the company grows and more computers arrive at the office, the method for handling desktop management must be considered.

The first and probably most used interconnecting use is the ubiquitous office electronic mail system. As soon as it is set up, it becomes extremely popular, and for good reason, it offers the fastest and surest communication method. And the fact that it can also eliminate a few meetings probably helps explain the popularity. Having professionals dedicated to the set up and maintenance of the office information technology network is the most efficient way to get the most out of its capabilities. One of the drawbacks to computers is the complexity of keeping them running, updated and working for the employees, instead of the other way around. The costs of allowing each employee to set up their own machine and keep it working can exceed the value of the system.

Having a team of professionals dedicated to the job of nurturing the information systems network really can increase the productivity of employees and the company overall, boosting the bottom line despite the cost if installation and upkeep. The notion of dedicating a team to this process smells a little like inflated bureaucracy, but this increase in personnel has a demonstrable positive effect on profit. The centralization of computer care makes them more efficient in a number of ways. First and foremost, it allows the company to be sure that all the computer products are compatible, which can save a lot of embarrassment and loss resulting from data which can not be presented. It also ensures that all the software in the system is standard, meaning that there are no special programs that individual employees may have fallen in love with. Software is not always as easily installed as we would like, even those which tout a plug and play platform. Inevitably there are some machines display complications with compatibility with the configuration in place, almost the way some people present with allergic reactions to medicines most tolerate well. Dealing with these complications can cost many man hours when preformed by the average worker who maybe skilled with using the computer, but not necessarily with servicing it. When an employee has compatible computer setups at home and at the office, the temptation to take work home and bring the results back can be too hard to resist. This well meaning effort to give even more energy and effort to the company can also result in giving the company network malicious software that can wreak havoc on the system. Having professionals on staff to resolve these problems is a very valuable addition and can save the business from catastrophe.

When employees introduce software from home, they risk circumventing preventive efforts by the desktop management team to keep malware out of the system. It is complicated enough to fight the constant attacks from the external world of the internet. Protecting from intrusions within the firewalls and other protective measures is difficult, costly and inefficient and a bane to the technicians working hard to keep the system running.

The age of the computer has changed business in many ways, allowing the manager unprecedented span of knowledge and control over all processes relating to his business. This has allowed for the use of data and information on an unprecedented scale. The drawback is that the available data for any business can be unwieldy and it is very possible to drown the manager in information. This is the time to leverage the power of processing to control the computer via systems management software.

 

Business has long had a need for more information. Management has always sought the answer to such questions as what will sell, when it should be sold, how can we get the product to the consumer quicker, and what inefficiencies are we experiencing. With the advent of the microprocessor, the old adage of be careful what you wish for may be an important consideration. We can now measure so many things and compile so much data that the manufacturing process becomes hard to recognize.

 

The manager is now faced with so much information about every topic that discerning the valuable information from background noise data is seriously problematic. Hiring decisions used to be made following an interview, with questions and answers and the unquantifiable interpersonal ques an interview provides. Today a successful candidate of yore may be electronically eliminated by an insignificant criterion before an interview is even conducted.

 

While the data is important and even critical to a competitive organization, the methodology for gleaning information does impact the final data. Once all this data has been collected, the manager must make sense of it and put it to use in a practical way, a difficult endeavor made more complex by not having a good handle on the parameters under which it was collected. This is further complicated by the issue of time, just how much should be spent on the analysis of data?

 

The reason information systems became such an integral part of business is their ability to enhance the decision making process. When the use of the system becomes so cumbersome and time consuming that it cuts into the time a manager has to explore data and make operational decisions, it has stopped enhancing the business. The complexity of our tools is rapidly becoming more problematic than running a business without them. While there is certainly reason to expend energy training management on new tools and software, it should not continue to erode their time on a day to day basis.

 

It is the essence of management to see the bigger picture, to make the decisions that will not only allow for the day to day business to get done, but to have a solid feel for what needs to be done to stay in business tomorrow. These two aspects of leadership conflict with a critical element of the reality of management, balancing time requirements. To that end, information systems were initiated to allow the manager greater access to information more quickly. While this has been a success, the data has become increasingly complex, and more and more time is eaten up processing it.

 

All leaders intrinsically want to have a feel for what their company is doing. There is no scarier feeling than being responsible for something and not having the first hand knowledge of what is being done to make it happen. This does not mean that the CEO of a company needs to know the name, start time destination and cargo of every truck carrying product within his company, that is what the management hierarchy is about. Unfortunately, the nature of man is to be curious, and if the data is available it is difficult not to get captured in the mountains of minutia.

 

So while it is important that someone is aware of the collection and interpretation of all the detailed information a company has, there has to be a way to develop that raw data into useful knowledge for each level of management. This is the crux of systems management software, manipulating data collected by software systems to develop actionable information for leadership to run the business efficiently and profitably.